Skip to main content
Written in Los Angeles An independent journal of the thread lift

Section I · First Principles

Thread Lift or Facelift: How to Decide Between Them

The comparison between a thread lift and a facelift is usually made by someone who sells one of them. A surgeon will tell you threads are a temporary compromise.

Woman in a white coat reviewing printed pages with another woman at a marble table

A clinic that does not have an operating room will tell you surgery is old-fashioned. Both statements contain some truth and a lot of self-interest. This guide sets the two side by side from the point of view of the person paying for it.

We do not perform either procedure. We have talked to people who have had each, read the literature, and sat through enough consultations to know which questions get dodged.

What each procedure does

A surgical facelift, in its modern forms, lifts and repositions the deeper layer of muscle and connective tissue under the skin, then trims the excess skin and closes the incisions around the ear and into the hairline.

It addresses the jowls, the neck and the lower face directly. It is surgery, usually under general anaesthesia or deep sedation, and it is done by a surgeon in an accredited facility.

A thread lift passes barbed dissolvable sutures under the skin and uses them to gather and hold sagging soft tissue. It removes nothing. It works in the layer above the one a facelift repositions.

It is done under local anaesthetic in a treatment room, takes about an hour, and you drive home afterwards, or better, are driven.

Put crudely, a facelift rebuilds and a thread lift tidies. That is not a criticism of either. It is a description of scale.

Two garden paths, one paved and one gravel, dividing in a landscaped park in morning haze

The deciding factor: how much laxity you have

On the ground, the useful distinction is between skin that has softened and skin that has become redundant. Mild to moderate laxity, where the jawline has blurred and the mid-face has dropped a little but the skin still snaps back when pinched, is thread territory.

Heavy jowls, a neck with vertical bands or a hanging fold, and skin that stays folded when you let go are facelift territory. Threads placed in a face with significant redundancy produce a small, short-lived lift and a disappointed patient.

Age is a proxy for laxity, not a rule. Some people in their late thirties have the kind of early softening that threads address well. Some people in their fifties have skin quality that still suits threads.

Many people in their sixties are past what threads can do, and a practitioner who offers them anyway is offering what they sell rather than what fits.

Recovery, honestly described

Thread lift recovery is measured in days to a couple of weeks. Swelling peaks around day two or three. Bruising, if present, fades over a week or so.

A pulling sensation and some tenderness persist for a couple of weeks, along with restrictions on chewing, sleeping position, exercise and facial treatments. Most people are presentable within a few days. Some take longer.

Nobody should be told there is nothing to recover from.

Facelift recovery is measured in weeks to months. Drains, dressings and a compression garment for the first days. Significant swelling and bruising for two to three weeks.

Numbness that can last months. Incision lines that mature over a year. Most people take two to three weeks off before they are comfortable being seen, and the final result is judged at several months.

It is a serious operation and should be planned as one.

Lifespan

Thread lift results are temporary. The mechanical lift softens as the threads lose strength and dissolve over months. Any lasting change comes from the tissue response along the thread path, which varies.

Ranges quoted by practitioners run from under a year to a couple of years, and the longer figures depend on the collagen phase and on the individual. Treat all of them as estimates.

Facelift results are long-lasting but not permanent. The face keeps ageing from the new starting point. Many people are still happy with the result a decade on.

Some choose a second, smaller procedure years later. "Ten years" is a figure often quoted and is best read as a rough order of magnitude rather than a promise.

When comparing options, the choice often turns on how you feel about repetition. A thread lift is a procedure you might repeat every year or two. A facelift is a procedure you might have once.

Cost, as a structure rather than a number

We do not publish prices. Los Angeles quotes change too fast and are built too differently to summarise honestly. What we can describe is the shape.

A thread lift is priced per thread, per area or per session. The number of threads drives the total, and that number should be on the quote.

Because the result is temporary, the true cost is the per-session price multiplied by however many sessions you have over the years you care about.

A facelift is priced as a package: surgeon's fee, anaesthesia, facility fee, and follow-up. It is a much larger single figure. Spread across the years the result lasts, the arithmetic can look different from the way it looks on the day.

Neither is cheap. Anyone offering either at a price that seems too good is worth a second look at their credentials before their calendar.

Risk

Both carry risk. A thread lift can cause dimpling, visible or palpable threads, asymmetry, extrusion, infection, and in uncommon cases nerve irritation or prolonged pain. Most of these resolve or can be corrected.

Because it is less invasive, its risks are generally less severe, but "less invasive" is not the same as "safe", and the word "minor" should not appear in a consent form.

A facelift carries surgical risks: bleeding, haematoma, infection, nerve injury, poor scarring, skin loss, and the general risks of anaesthesia. Rates are low in experienced hands and accredited facilities. They are not zero.

The general hygiene and infection guidance published by the CDC is a reasonable primer on what a post-procedure infection looks like, whatever procedure you choose.

The cases where neither is right

A surprising number of people asking "threads or facelift" need neither. Volume loss in the mid-face is often better addressed with fillers, or with fat transfer at the time of surgery, than with a lift of any kind.

Skin quality problems, meaning texture, pigment and fine lines, respond to resurfacing and not to lifting. Mild early laxity in a young face sometimes responds well enough to an energy-based tightening device to postpone the decision for years.

And some people, on reflection, decide the change they want is not one a procedure delivers.

A good consultation raises these possibilities without being asked. A poor one steers you toward whatever the practice sells.

Reader questions we hear most

Can I have threads now and a facelift later? Yes, and many surgeons see patients who have. Dissolved threads leave fibrous tissue along their paths, which can make the surgical plane a little more tedious to work in, but it is not a barrier.

Tell the surgeon what you had, when, and with which material.

Can threads postpone a facelift? For someone with mild laxity, possibly by a few years, if the result is repeated.

For someone who is already a facelift candidate, threads tend to postpone the decision rather than the need, and the money spent in the meantime is real.

Is a "mini facelift" the middle option? A mini facelift is still surgery, with shorter incisions and a smaller area of dissection. It is closer to a full facelift than to threads in recovery, risk and durability.

It is a real option for moderate lower-face laxity and belongs in the surgical consultation rather than the thread one.

What about age? We keep returning to this because readers keep asking. Age is a poor guide on its own.

Laxity, skin quality and volume are what the practitioner should be assessing. If the consultation opens with your date of birth and closes with a recommendation, it has skipped the examination.

Which has the more predictable result? Surgery, in experienced hands. A facelift addresses the deeper structure directly and the surgeon can see what they are doing.

Threads work through a cannula in a tissue plane the practitioner feels rather than sees, and the result depends more on how your tissue responds. That is not an argument against threads. It is an argument for modest expectations.

A decision routine

With that context, the better question is not "which is better" but "which fits my laxity, my recovery budget and my appetite for repeating this". Answer those three honestly, in that order.

If the skin fold at your jaw stays put when you let go, take the surgical consultation seriously. If it springs back and the change you want is subtle, take the thread consultation seriously.

If you are torn, have both consultations and notice which practitioner spends more time talking you out of things.

Recovery planning helps either way.

A friend of the journal spent her thread lift recovery week at The Huntington in San Marino, in the shade of the gardens, which was a better use of a swollen face than a work meeting.

The facelift version of that week is a rented room with a good chair and someone to drive you.

About

About the Journal

Thread Lift Journal is written and edited by one Los Angeles family working as independent, non-clinical editors. Nobody on the desk holds a medical licence, places threads, or takes a fee from any clinic.

We read the literature, talk to people who have had the procedures, and hold our wording to the house rules set out on Our Story. Decisions about your own face belong with a licensed clinician who has examined it.

First pages to read

Continued from Section I

Three companion pieces in the same section

This article sits in a section with three companion pieces, and we publish no newsletter. The section opener is where the coverage continues:

Thread Lifts and the Non-Surgical Facelift: First Principles